Charlie Kirk Scorches Meghan Markle After Oprah Tell-All Interview

Photo by Gage Skidmore

Conservative superstar Charlie Kirk laid into wayward royal Meghan Markle over her shameless, tell-all interview with Oprah.

In particular Kirk blasted Markle’s claim that a member of the royal family raised concerns over her child’s skin color, speculating that she had made up the story.

As The New York Post reports:

Conservative radio host Charlie Kirk has accused Meghan Markle of fabricating the story of how a member of the royal family raised concerns over the color of her son Archie’s skin — suggesting that she was probably “making it up like Jussie Smollet.”

“The Charlie Kirk Show” host said Monday that he believes Markle made up the story to drum up sympathy during her tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey.

“I think she’s making it up, like Jussie Smollett,” said Kirk, referring to the “Empire” actor who staged a hate crime against himself in January 2019.

“I think somebody said something, completely different, in a different category, and she is using it now to go make people feel sorry for her.”


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ruby
3 years ago

I don’t understand why the wealthy and the people in government will never admit
their wrongdoing! They always blame other people for their own shortcoming. I don’t know why anyone would disparage any child!

Pam
Pam
3 years ago
Reply to  Ruby

Why would you believe what she said is true? If there was an issue, I doubt that the Queen would have been so welcoming to her. She was invited to the Christmas gathering right away for instance. Kate wasn’t. The facts lend one to believe that Megs is stretching the truth to say the least. The fact that she didn’t identify the culprit is also suspect. One can’t make vague accusations like that that are very serious and expect to be believed.

Displayguy
Displayguy
3 years ago

Fact is she was the only concerned – typical liberal snowflake, trying to transfer her feelings to someone else.

Cee Jay
Cee Jay
3 years ago

I’ll bet there were/are friends and relatives pondering the color of the child’s hair and eyes, too. That doesn’t make them racist; it makes them curious, and interested. I, too, question if this subject was broached at all, let alone in a malicious manner. But there was that one aunt who didn’t like the marriage and she voiced her objection in a rather coarse way, so who knows?

mary Ruen
mary Ruen
3 years ago
Reply to  Cee Jay

And who really cares

stephen leonhard
3 years ago
Reply to  mary Ruen

I really do not care what any of the “Royals” do! I think the Brits are foolish to support this outdated institution. Our founding fathers knew better and saved us several fortunes!!

BonnieBlue
BonnieBlue
3 years ago
Reply to  Cee Jay

I’m pretty sure all of us wonder what combination of ourselves and our family’s traits will appear in our soon-to-be-born babies. If one parent is as fair as Harry, and one as dark haired as Meghan, that’s about the same as a 5’3″ mother and a 6’5″ father – you have to wonder if the tall genes or the short ones will dominate. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, it’s part of the fun of anticipation.

Cindy Galt
3 years ago
Reply to  Cee Jay

I wonder, though, how the family would have acted if Archie had gotten more of Megan’s black characteristics and looks.

Barbara
Barbara
3 years ago

WHAT MEGHAN IS DOING AND HAS BEEN DOING IS PUSHING HER NASTY LIBERAL AGENDA ON THE ROYALS AND HOPING SHE CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. IT WOULD BE JUST LIKE HER TO NAME HER SON ARCHIE FOR WHAT REASON THAT IS NO NAME OF ANY ROYAL LINAGE. IT IS HARRY WHO SHOULD HAVE PUT HIS FOOT DOWN ON THAT AND IF SHE IS A GIRL HARRY BETTER MAKE SURE IT IS A NAME OF ROYAL LINAGE. WHO IS WEARING THE PANTS IN THE MARRIAGE HER . WHEN SHE HAS SCREWED UP HER RELATION WITH HER OWN FAMILY.???

Linda
Linda
3 years ago
Reply to  Barbara

I totally agree. I think she’s jealous of Kate and will because she can’t be the queen. Harry is so pussy whipped it’s pathetic.

Craig Murphy
Craig Murphy
3 years ago
Reply to  Linda

The queen was very diplomatic about it all when she said, ” they are so perfect for each other, don’t you think?

Allen
Allen
3 years ago
Reply to  Linda

I love it. Thank you for using the whipped adjective. As a man I cannot say that or I would be cancelled. I really like all of the responses in this section from you, Craig and Faye.

Vanilla Cream
Vanilla Cream
3 years ago
Reply to  Linda

I’m not a “royal watcher”, but I read excerpts and snippets and understand the rigid restrictions they live under. For this whiner to claim she wasn’t aware of the “rules” is a lie. She thought she could barge in, claim racism, and change rules that were put into place by King George VIII or whomever. Her child is not entitled to be a prince and her tantrums will never change that. I’m so disappointed in Harry and I agree he is P.W’d. Who in the world is so shallow, with nothing more important in life than to waste time watching Oprah’s show? I thought Harry lost all his money when he disowned the royals …. where are they getting their money to live such an extravagant life? Of course, the $7 million Oprah paid them will pay a few bills.

Christine Richards
Christine Richards
3 years ago
Reply to  Barbara

I suspect the suicide story was staged to coerce Harry by using painful memories of his mother’s harassment by the press.

Faye
Faye
3 years ago
Reply to  Barbara

She has to have all the power! Harry is whipped! If ya can’t get along with your own family, how can ya get along with someone else’s family! She’s expendable!

Cindy Galt
3 years ago
Reply to  Barbara

Harry named him Archie, and it was to honor a late friend.

Julie
Julie
3 years ago
Reply to  Barbara

I wonder if she realizes she gave her baby the name of the biggest funniest racist fictional character on a television sitcom LMAO…Cuz when I hear the name Archie…I always think Bunker…they should bring that show back

Pamela J. Bjerke
Pamela J. Bjerke
3 years ago

Drumming up a salacious interview for a $7,000,000 payout is how she now wants to make money. Easy to tell who’s in charge of that family. Unfortunately, Harry really has his hands full now.

Chris
Chris
3 years ago

Of course she lied, her and Harry want the money and had to come up with some story to make it interesting to viewers. She’s a user.

Nine Island Girl
Nine Island Girl
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris

It’s very expensive to live in a huge mansion in Santa Barbara, CA.
Doncha ya know, they’re just like us.
That’s why they need a huge house and security. Hahaha

Chris
Chris
3 years ago

She wants money and security she should have stayed with the royals. Here she’s just trash.

CasualObserver
CasualObserver
3 years ago

The SORRY D-list is desperately trying to rake in money, whatever it’d take. Since the American Garbage could sell her skin pigment to the Brits, now it is back to the good old US of A and cry the river to the gullible. And if stories need to be made up, so be it. But, hey, it’s been working well for the trailer trash, isn’t it? Pathetic harry and archie are nothing more than prawns for this bottomless pit.

Bob Hartman
Bob Hartman
3 years ago

So who moves to another country to live a quiet life and then can’t keep themselves out of the limelight for more than a month. She’s making Harry look like a fool. Most people in this country could give a ratts ass about them.

Nine Island Girl
Nine Island Girl
3 years ago

This has been/wanna be again Socialist turd knows exactly what she’s doing.
I don’t care what the royals say, but this whole arrangement was NEVER blessed by the queen. Mz opportunist just was itching to shoot her mouth off about politics and all the other liberal garbage she spews out of her pie hole.
Harry needs to keep his trap shut about anything AMERICA! Period!
Go back to your shit hole country already.
You’re NOT a citizen of the United States of America.

Marisa
3 years ago

I read recently that she might consider running for public office sometime in the future

Her huge ego might settle for President Markle.
😄😄😄😄

Smc
Smc
3 years ago

Even socialist Canada didn’t want her. I guess she fits in perfectly in California. Socialist state of America.

Tony Winters
Tony Winters
3 years ago

Although I think that the Royal Family is not all wrapped too tight, this whole thing with Markle has nothing to do with Race and more to do with Her and Her Child NOT getting all of the attention. She is a Movie Star, although I have no idea what movie she was ever in, and as a movie star she is used to having people falling all over themselves to talk with her, get her autograph, or just for the chance to be in the same room with her. Of course, this was not the case once she entered the Royal family. I believe that not long ago the rules for succession were changed to allow female children to take the throne. If this is the case, then after Prince Charles becomes King, then comes William and then his son, George, and then George’s son. So there would have to be a major disaster causing the death of a bunch of people before Harry can become King. So although Harry may be a nice guy, he ain’t going to be King, so he is just Prince Charle’s second son and nothing more, and as for Markle, she is one notch below him. Markle should have read the fine print on the marriage contract.

Chris
Chris
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Winters

There she was royal garbage, here she’s just garbage.

Allen
Allen
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris

Ha, very good observation.

Faye
Faye
3 years ago

I absolutely do not believe what the attention hog M.M. had to say! She wants sympathy & attention! She knew with Oprah she could get mega attention! She’s an actor don’t forget! 😡

Chris
Chris
3 years ago
Reply to  Faye

And the better the story the more money they get.

Craig Murphy
Craig Murphy
3 years ago

Come on, Charlie, it was a $7 million catharsis. Stop being so cynical

Janette
Janette
3 years ago

Gold digger! I think I remember people saying that she would be working hart to destroy the British people! What a disgraceful piece of trash. Everyone knows that she is jealous as hell of Kate! She will probably name the baby girl Edith ! Shame on Harry!

Ginny Rocco
Ginny Rocco
3 years ago

Who cares, they are just lazy people collecting money from the working people and have the nerve to complain. Markle was the worst thing that happened to that family (dividing the 2 brothers).

madmemere
madmemere
3 years ago
Reply to  Ginny Rocco

The “worst thing”?? I can think of, at least, one other, if you remember Wallace Simpson; the one who caused Edward VIII to abdicate the throne. They then became the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Same type of woman, divorcee, greedy, etc.

Trixie
Trixie
3 years ago

She’s a lying attention whore. Poor Harry and the kids….

Anita Wasemann
Anita Wasemann
3 years ago

Of course it was made up, or at least greatly exaggerated or an innocent remark was purposely misinterpreted.
Do you think Oprah, or anyone else’ would have paid 7 million for an interview that did not contain a sensational bombshell?
“Follow the Money”, it will answer “Why?” every time.
Maybe it would be a good time to reveal the results of the DNA test you know Charles had done on Harry…
Oops, did I really write that?

Ursus Logicus
Ursus Logicus
3 years ago

Not knowing first hand, I can only guess how very difficult it is to marry into British royalty, become an instant millionaire-welfare recipient, and be waited on and pampered for life at the nation’s expense.

Indolent lives are very hard to live; one gets so pale living in a 20,000 SF castle. That’s why 10-day weekend vacations in Monte Carlo and the French Riviera are forced on them.

Come on, man. Have some sympathy.

TomB
TomB
3 years ago

Agree with you Charlie, agree 100%…

oldedude
oldedude
3 years ago

I think Meghan Markle is disgusting – and Harry is a fool and an ingrate badly in need of a testosterone booster. It’s not just this “color of Archie’s skin” BS, it’s the assertion that Archie isn’t a “Prince” because of “racism”. NO – Archie is NOT a “Prince” because, back in 1917, King George V declared that the term “Prince” would NOT extend to royal grandchildren who were NOT in the “direct line of the succession”. Therefore, Prince William’s children are “princes” and “princesses” (since he is 2nd in succession and his oldest son is 3rd), but NONE of Harry’s children (regardless of their mother’s ostensible race) can be since he is only a collateral successor to the throne (meaning William and all his kids would have to die before Harry OR Archie could become King). In fact, the present Queen was NOT a “princess” under the same rule UNTIL her uncle, Edward VIII, abdicated in order to marry Wallis Simpson, thereby making Elizabeth’s father, George VI, king, moving her into the direct succession. Markle is either too ignorant to know that and should have kept her mouth shut or, more likely, too determined to make a point, and should be shouted down for the publicity-seeker and liar that she is. Pierce Morgan and I don’t agree on much, but I agree with him when he says that he wouldn’t believe Meghan Markle if she was reading the weather report (his response to her lies and slanders in the Oprah interview).

Laxmom
Laxmom
3 years ago

Charlie is SPOT ON!

Camus
Camus
3 years ago

Diana all over again. $1000 they’ll divorce in two years ? Harry was an idiot to marry this mouthy, insecure narcissist.

Cindy Galt
3 years ago
Reply to  Camus

Don’t compare her to Diana; Diana was treated horribly by Charles and the rest of the “royals”. Charles was expected to go out and fine a nice little virgin to marry and bare him an heir, but she finally wised up and became her own woman. Evidentially, Harry has not yet become his own man.

Cindy Galt
3 years ago

I don’t feel sorry for her; Harry should have given her a few more pointers on what to expect from his family. They all seem and act like snobs, including the Queen. She did not have the decency to acknowledge Diana’s death until forced to do so. She has overlooked Andrew’s and Charles’s misdeeds for far too long. Extra marital affairs are “expected” to happen with the men, but Diana was vilified by the family for hers. I bet Megan is right about someone in the family wondering how dark Archie’s skin would be, and I have a good idea of who it might be.

mokangal
mokangal
3 years ago

I think she is playing the race card to get back her status in the royal family and not lost the resources they had when they were there. Shame on her.

Ulla
Ulla
3 years ago

Yep, I feel the same way Kirk, and to tell you the truth, I for one am tired of hearing or reading about that whole thing, it has gotten to the point where it is both dull and boring….

Dodie
Dodie
3 years ago
Reply to  Ulla

Charlie is right, but who really cares!

trackback
1 year ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Here you will find 88016 additional Info on that Topic: americanupdate.com/politics-and-culture/charlie-kirk-scorches-meghan-markle-after-oprah-tell-all-interview/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here on that Topic: americanupdate.com/politics-and-culture/charlie-kirk-scorches-meghan-markle-after-oprah-tell-all-interview/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you can find 59364 more Information to that Topic: americanupdate.com/politics-and-culture/charlie-kirk-scorches-meghan-markle-after-oprah-tell-all-interview/ […]

trackback
1 year ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More on on that Topic: americanupdate.com/politics-and-culture/charlie-kirk-scorches-meghan-markle-after-oprah-tell-all-interview/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: americanupdate.com/politics-and-culture/charlie-kirk-scorches-meghan-markle-after-oprah-tell-all-interview/ […]